Achaemenids in Egypt

Document Type : Book Review

Author

Tissaphernes Archaeological Research Group

Abstract

Cambyses II, following in the footsteps of Cyrus the Great, continued the Achaemenid policy of consolidating and expanding the empire’s territorial holdings. One of the strategic territorialization endeavors involved a campaign to Egypt, the preparations for which had been initiated during Cyrus’s reign and executed by Cambyses. This military campaign resulted in the annexation of Egypt to the vast Achaemenid Empire. To gain a more profound insight into the reciprocal cultural influences between the Achaemenids and Egypt, it is imperative to meticulously examine the extant archaeological evidence from this period, unearthed and studied by diverse archaeologists and scholars. This article aims to provide a critical assessment of the book Achaemenids in Egypt with a focus on archaeological evidence.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction
Despite the plethora of books and articles addressing the Achaemenid Empire in recent years, this historical period still holds untapped research potential. Following the reign of Cyrus the Great, Cambyses II ascended to the throne of the Achaemenid Empire and continued to uphold the foundational principles of Cyrus’s rule, centered on the consolidation and expansion of the empire’s territorial boundaries. This article aims to critically assess the book titled Achaemenids in Egypt (based on archaeological evidence), authored by Shahin Mahyar and published by Jam-e Gol Publications in 2012, encompassing 126 pages.
The book’s initial chapter delves into the formation of the Achaemenid government, its political history, and ancient Egypt, including its geographical extent, deities, and Achaemenid interactions with Egypt. The second chapter introduces the archaeological findings in Egypt, the third chapter offers a summary of the book’s content, the fourth chapter comprises illustrations, and the work terminates with a bibliography.
The section pertaining to the Achaemenid Empire, divided into subheadings like formation, political history, significant events, and geographical expanse, is notably lacking in completeness. Given the book’s focus on the Achaemenid presence in Egypt, a comprehensive discussion of the Achaemenid monarchs involved in Egyptian affairs should have been explicitly addressed. However, this aspect has been overlooked, with only a few paragraphs dedicated to it. To enhance the book’s references and scholarly merit, the author could have drawn from prominent publications such as History of the Persian Empire by Olmstead (2001), and The Achaemenid Empire by Kurt (2000), and adopted an impartial and scholarly approach to Herodotus’s historical account in Histories (1960). Additionally, valuable sources in this field include Posener (1936), Roaf (1974), Mysliwiec (1997), and Jacobs (1994), among others, which could have enriched the book’s scholarly foundation.


Conclusion
This book offers an overview of the archaeology and history of the Achaemenid Empire in Egypt. A notable limitation of the reviewed book is its relatively limited utilization of scholarly sources authored by renowned experts in the field of Achaemenid studies. The author could have significantly strengthened their work by conducting a more in-depth examination of the Achaemenid presence in Egypt, drawing upon a broader array of well-established and contemporaneous sources. Additionally, a more rigorous and scientific approach to analyzing the archaeological evidence related to the Achaemenids in Egypt could have enhanced the book’s overall scholarly rigor and credibility.

🔓 © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Tissaphernes Archaeological Research Group, Tehran, Iran. Open Access. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The ethical policy of Ancient Iranian Studies is based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines and complies with International Committee of Ancient Iranian Studies Editorial Board codes of conduct. Readers, authors, reviewers and editors should follow these ethical policies once working with Ancient Iranian Studies. The ethical policy of Ancient Iranian Studies is liable to determine which of the typical research papers or articles submitted to the journal should be published in the concerned issue. For information on this matter in publishing and ethical guidelines please visit www.publicationethics.org.

اومستد، آلبرت تن آیک. (1380). تاریخ شاهنشاهی هخامنشی، ترجمه محمد مقدم، تهران: امیر کبیر.
Olmstead, Albert Ten Eyck. (1948). History of the Persian Empire, University of Chicago Press.
سرفراز، علی‌اکبر، فیروزمندی، بهمن. (1383). باستان‌شناسی و هنر دوران تاریخی ماد، هخامنشی، اشکانی، ساسانی، تهران: انتشارات عفاف.
Sarfaraz, Aliakbar; Firouzmandi, Bahman. (2002). Archaeology and art of the historical periods, Tehran, Efaf.
کورت، آملی. (1379). هخامنشیان، ترجمه مرتضی ثاقب‌فر، تهران: نشر ققنوس.
Kuhrt, Amelie. (1997). The Achaemenid Empire, in The Ancient Near East, c. 3000-330 BC, Routledge.
ولایتی، رحیم، (1387). «مطالعه بخشی از یافته‌های باستان‌شناسی مرتبط با هنر هخامنشیان در مصر»، باغ نظر، شماره دهم. سال پنجم. 89-104
velayati, R. (2008). Study of archaeological Findings Related to the Art, Achaemenid Period in Egyptian. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar5(10), 89-104.
ولایتی، رحیم. (1389). «تأثیر هنر ملل تابعه امپراتوری هخامنشیان بر هنر و معماری آن‌ها»، باغ نظر، شماره 14، سال هفتم: 87-94
Velayati, R. (2010). “Influence Affiliated Nations Art on the Achaemenid Art and Architecture”, The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar7(14), 87-94.
هرودت (1339). تاریخ هرودت، ترجمه هادی هدایتی، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران. 
Herodotus, (2010). Histories, Translated by Hadi Hedayati, Tehran, Tehran University.
 
English
Arabzadeh Sarbanani, M. (2023). Revisiting the Book of Esther: Assessing the Historical Significance of the Masoretic Version for the Achaemenian History. Persica Antiqua3(4), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.22034/pa.2022.344449.1009
Jacobs, Bruno. (1994). Die Satrapien Verwaltung im persich Zur Zeit Darius III, Wiesbaden.
Khosravi, I. (2022). “An Investigation of Achaemenid Political Religion”, Ancient Iranian studies1(4), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.22034/ais.2023.371171.1025
MehrAfarin, R. (2021). “Functional Analysis of the Structure No. 3 of Dahān-e Qolāmān in Sistan of Iran”, Persica Antiqua1(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.22034/pa.2021.134073
Mysliwiec, Karol. (1997). Herr beider Länder. Ägypten im 1. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Zabern.
Nazari, S., & Sharbaf, M. (2023). “Some Remarks on the Identity of the Ram-Headed Bronze Statuette from Persepolis”, Persica Antiqua3(4), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.22034/pa.2022.350535.1017
Posener, G. (1936). Premiere Domination Perse En Egypte, Recueil D. inscription- Hieroglyphiques, Le Gaire Imprimeie De L : Intitut Francais.
Rezaei Naraghi, N. (2022). “Study of “Eye-Stone” in Achaemenid Period”, Ancient Iranian studies1(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.22034/ais.2022.146350
Roaf, Michael. (1974). Mesopotamien, Welatlas der alten Kulturen, Muenchen.
Salahshoor, A. A. (2022). The Concept of "Gods, Other Gods, and All the Gods" in the Royal Ideology of the Achaemenid Kings. Ancient Iranian studies1(2), 55-79. https://doi.org/10.22034/ais.2022.345838.1016